Skip to main content


This I ripped off from library guru Walt Crawford, who got it from SF author and uber-blogger John Scalzi. From whom I learned that AOL still exists and that there is a paid version of LiveJournal. Who knew? And why Rhapsody? Who are these people who are willing to pay every month to rent music that could be taken away from them at any time? Those who don't want the option of making a mix CD or tape do not love music in any way I can understand. I was glad that some of Scalzi's commentors mentioned library subscriptions. Don't pay for any online encyclopedias or magazine articles if you can get them free with your library card, people! The free Encyclopedia Britannica subscription for bloggers is also awesome.

1. IpHouse for Internet with Qwest DSL. I could save by bundling with Qwest and get email (ugh!), but IpHouse has given me such great support over the years and I can always get someone on the phone right away.

2. Netflix (4 movies-at-a-time grandfathered account). I watch a lot of movies, so it's definitely worth it, and it keeps me from being tempted to get cable. What with TV shows on Netflix, from the library and on Apple TV, I can barely stand to watch commercials any more.

3. Flickr Pro. I consider it a backup option for my photos. I have over 1700 on there right now, so going back to the 200 limit on the free account would be hard.

4. Amazon Prime. It pays for itself over the holidays.

5. GoDaddy web site for $10/year. So no one else can ever have Branding, baby!

Things I used to pay for, but dropped:

1. Live365. I listen to most of my Internet radio on AppleTV now, and there's no way to get the subscribers-only no-commercials version of Live365 radio stations on there (that I know of, at least).

2. I don't need a fancier web page than Blogger can provide, and I can access files away from home with a flash drive. We Macies pay more for a better computer, we should get this service free, dammit!

Things I might pay for in the future:

1. Librarything. It's only $25 for a lifetime membership, and I'm nearing the 200-book maximum for a free account. I really like the way they organize my library, just wish there was as good a catalog for music and movies.

2. I plan to donate to some of my favorite Internet radio stations like Radio Nigel and Japan-A-Radio, don't know if that counts.


John Scalzi said…
"Who are these people who are willing to pay every month to rent music that could be taken away from them at any time?"

In my case, someone who understands that renting the music doesn't mean I own it, so having it taken away from me doesn't strike me as monstrously unfair (mind you, not that any of it's been taken away in the six or so years I've been using it).

I, any event, I use Rhapsody to sample songs and albums, and anything I decide I like I buy outright, in a non-DRM medium. So even if Rhapsody were to disappear tomorrow, the only music I'd lose is the stuff I don't like enough to own. And I'm fine with that.
ash966 said…
So it's more of a replacement for radio than a replacement for a music collection? I understand that even less. As a replacement for ownership, there are plenty of people without big existing music collections who commute a lot, travel a lot, live in tiny places, have many different devices for playing, several people living in the same place, etc. They are very different from me, with my 5600 songs on my iPod and my Apple TV and my 300 LPs only partially digitized, no car, no long commute, but I understand that the market exists.

However, as a replacement for radio, a big corporation charging a big fat monthly fee is my greatest fear (it works so well for TV), so I'd rather give annual donations to these guys or to small Internet radio stations than money to Rhapsody or XM/Sirius which would validate their business model. According to the comments here, XM/Sirius is cutting stations left and right, so it is a legitimate fear, especially in this economy.

For finding new stuff, I have podcasts (free), SeeqPod (free), internet radio (free so far), and soon I hope to have LastFm on my iPod Touch (free-diddly-free).

Anyway, thanks for commenting.


JethSeux said…
You tell em Sweetie!
About the only thing I would pay for, given the right computer set up where I could conveniently listen to it all the time, would possibly be NetLibrary.
I am not sure how many titles they have yet, but the thought intrigues me of having a huge library of books on mp3 available to you with no long waits for ILLs, no one reserving your copy when you are halfway through, and no CD fritzing out in a key plot moment and leaving you with a gaping hole in the story-line when you are halfway through!
Hopefully libraries expand their subscriptions to Netlibrary as time goes on and I won't have to pay though.

Popular posts from this blog


This is real heavy metal, by the way . So, this guy whose name I swear I'd never heard but appeared to have gone to my high school tried to friend me on Facebook. His main interests were the band Stryper and Republicanism, so I didn't add him. I mean, really, Stryper ? I thought teens in the 80s only listened to them because they liked metal and their parents forbade any other band as a direct path to the worship of Satan. When you leave home, you throw away their records and listen to real metal. But then I read this article that said we are all getting trapped in a bubble of like-minded people who parrot our ideas back to us, due to social networks and rss feeds and apps only giving us the people/opinions/stories we want to hear. And I thought--maybe I was wrong. Or maybe I'm OK, because I do have a lot of weird interests that make it pretty hard to find people who are on the same page with everything. I have social network connections with people around roleplaying game


  Chromecast CD storage Antenna Blu-ray player Apple TV Receiver Record player VHS Tape player So, I decided to spend my tax refund on home entertainment this year, as TV keeps getting better, whereas movies... not so much. My computer is old, but it still works, and replacing a computer seems less urgent when you have mobile devices. It feels like a long time ago when RAM and processor power seemed so important in order to use the latest bloated software, but now with so many webapps and sites designed for mobile, as long as your Internet is fast enough, you're OK. Lifehacker says to spend money where you spend most of your time, and I now use my tablet more than my desktop. Also, with all the streams I have access to, there was one chink in my entertainment system -- my TV was not actually big enough to appreciate high definition. Well, it seemed like a good deal in 2007, at $200 more than my new one which is almost twice as big. The main thing stopping me


 The Advocate has suggested that the greatest (i.e. only good) reality show ever, Rupaul's Drag Race , have a drag king contestant.  That's fine, but it would be much more entertaining to have a whole drag king competition. One of the best parts of Drag Race is seeing all the different types of queens compete: beauty queens, funny queens, conceptual queens, androgynous queens, scary queens, singing and dancing queens.  I want to see punk kings, gangsta rap kings, cock-rocking metal kings, panty-dropping R & B kings, country kings, baggy-pants burlesque comic kings, and of course, Elvis. I picked out some songs that make me think of different aspects of masculinity:  swaggering men, heartbroken men, lustful men, romantic men, philosophical men, and suicidally depressed men (interesting fact: I can think of dozens of songs by men about suicide, but only one female one: "Gloomy Sunday". What's up with that?) "That's Life" - Frank Sinatra