Skip to main content

THINGS I PAY FOR ONLINE

This I ripped off from library guru Walt Crawford, who got it from SF author and uber-blogger John Scalzi. From whom I learned that AOL still exists and that there is a paid version of LiveJournal. Who knew? And why Rhapsody? Who are these people who are willing to pay every month to rent music that could be taken away from them at any time? Those who don't want the option of making a mix CD or tape do not love music in any way I can understand. I was glad that some of Scalzi's commentors mentioned library subscriptions. Don't pay for any online encyclopedias or magazine articles if you can get them free with your library card, people! The free Encyclopedia Britannica subscription for bloggers is also awesome.


1. IpHouse for Internet with Qwest DSL. I could save by bundling with Qwest and get msn.com email (ugh!), but IpHouse has given me such great support over the years and I can always get someone on the phone right away.

2. Netflix (4 movies-at-a-time grandfathered account). I watch a lot of movies, so it's definitely worth it, and it keeps me from being tempted to get cable. What with TV shows on Netflix, from the library and on Apple TV, I can barely stand to watch commercials any more.

3. Flickr Pro. I consider it a backup option for my photos. I have over 1700 on there right now, so going back to the 200 limit on the free account would be hard.

4. Amazon Prime. It pays for itself over the holidays.

5. GoDaddy web site for $10/year. So no one else can ever have Badassjfro.com. Branding, baby!


Things I used to pay for, but dropped:

1. Live365. I listen to most of my Internet radio on AppleTV now, and there's no way to get the subscribers-only no-commercials version of Live365 radio stations on there (that I know of, at least).

2. Mac.com/MobileMe. I don't need a fancier web page than Blogger can provide, and I can access files away from home with a flash drive. We Macies pay more for a better computer, we should get this service free, dammit!


Things I might pay for in the future:

1. Librarything. It's only $25 for a lifetime membership, and I'm nearing the 200-book maximum for a free account. I really like the way they organize my library, just wish there was as good a catalog for music and movies.

2. I plan to donate to some of my favorite Internet radio stations like Radio Nigel and Japan-A-Radio, don't know if that counts.

Comments

John Scalzi said…
"Who are these people who are willing to pay every month to rent music that could be taken away from them at any time?"

In my case, someone who understands that renting the music doesn't mean I own it, so having it taken away from me doesn't strike me as monstrously unfair (mind you, not that any of it's been taken away in the six or so years I've been using it).

I, any event, I use Rhapsody to sample songs and albums, and anything I decide I like I buy outright, in a non-DRM medium. So even if Rhapsody were to disappear tomorrow, the only music I'd lose is the stuff I don't like enough to own. And I'm fine with that.
ash966 said…
So it's more of a replacement for radio than a replacement for a music collection? I understand that even less. As a replacement for ownership, there are plenty of people without big existing music collections who commute a lot, travel a lot, live in tiny places, have many different devices for playing, several people living in the same place, etc. They are very different from me, with my 5600 songs on my iPod and my Apple TV and my 300 LPs only partially digitized, no car, no long commute, but I understand that the market exists.



However, as a replacement for radio, a big corporation charging a big fat monthly fee is my greatest fear (it works so well for TV), so I'd rather give annual donations to these guys or to small Internet radio stations than money to Rhapsody or XM/Sirius which would validate their business model. According to the comments here, XM/Sirius is cutting stations left and right, so it is a legitimate fear, especially in this economy.



For finding new stuff, I have podcasts (free), SeeqPod (free), internet radio (free so far), and soon I hope to have LastFm on my iPod Touch (free-diddly-free).



Anyway, thanks for commenting.



--ASH






















JethSeux said…
You tell em Sweetie!
About the only thing I would pay for, given the right computer set up where I could conveniently listen to it all the time, would possibly be NetLibrary.
I am not sure how many titles they have yet, but the thought intrigues me of having a huge library of books on mp3 available to you with no long waits for ILLs, no one reserving your copy when you are halfway through, and no CD fritzing out in a key plot moment and leaving you with a gaping hole in the story-line when you are halfway through!
Hopefully libraries expand their subscriptions to Netlibrary as time goes on and I won't have to pay though.

Popular posts from this blog

STILL HATING ON MONTHLY SUBSCRIPTIONS

Jason had an insightful post on newspapers in the Internet Age on his blog wherein he suggested we donate to keep the watchdogs of the press going. In an aside, he mentioned subscriptions for music: To be honest, it's the same thing with music downloads. I've been screaming for monthly subscriptions for years now, and they're still not here. (At least not on the scale of an iTunes or Amazon.) Of course, I had to respond. Jason: I'm sorry to hear you've been screaming for years--you must be very hoarse. I believe the service you're looking for is called Rhapsody . I don't know what counts as "the same scale", but they have ads on TV. I don't know why anyone would pay $12.99/month to rent music, though. I want to own my music, I don't want some company to be able to take my access away or jack up the price at a whim. Rhapsody's main market must be people who don't own much music, have a lot of electronic devices but no interest
I, FOR ONE, WELCOME OUR NEW PORCINE OVERLORDS . . . I read an article in the New Yorker (1) last year about the growing threat of feral hogs. Apparently they have become a major nuisance in most of the US, destroying native habitat and species, even uprooting irrigation pipes. Plus, they are so wily and tough that only an expert hunter with at least 4 dogs can defeat one. Now, I learn that wild hogs may have caused the most recent outbreak of e. coli . It's clear what's going on -- the pigs are trying to kill us! Trichinosis just wasn't doing the job. With all the bacon I've eaten, I'll be the first up against the wall after the piggy revolution (here is where my sweetie Dr. Somneblex thoughtfully points out that he's given up pork). Coincidentally, I was just reading Oryx and Crake , which features the protagonist being attacked by genetically-altered super-pigs. Clearly, a pig-related horror movie is going to go into production any minute now. A good ti