Skip to main content

*SLOW CLAP*BRAVO, BIG MEDIA, BRAVO!*SLOW CLAP*


















So, the Oatmeal posted the above webcomic and some hailed him as a hero, while others said he was no-good pirating scum. 

What I don't understand is, even if you put pirating aside as a consideration, because pirates are all EVIL and will never give HBO any money ever, their approach still makes no economic sense. Last summer, I had no shows to watch, so I thought I'd download Game of Thrones from iTunes, like I do with Mad Men and Doctor Who. I pay $10/month to get network channels from Comcast (no reception where I live), so I figure I can afford to pay for a show or two.

But no, it wasn't available on iTunes until last week, at the same time my library has it (right of first sale, bitches!). I was able to get pretty high on the waiting list, so why the hell would I buy it now? Even if I lived near only poor libraries that couldn't afford DVDs, it's on Netflix as well.

I guess HBO thought my eagerness to try Game of Thrones out would cause another $70/month to magically appear in my checking account, but it doesn't actually work that way,

Meanwhile, in spite of losing plenty of subscribers already, Big Cable wants to alienate first-tier subscribers like me by pressuring the FCC to let them scramble the signal so we will be forced to install a huge, energy-draining box. Because connecting a cord to the back of the TV is just so hard and they have to send their employees to take care of it personally, apparently. Not because it causes customers' perfectly legal time-shifting devices like the Boxee Box, EyeTV and HD HomeRun to totally NOT WORK or anything (making us rush to pay another monthly fee for their own DVRs, they hope). So if you have a cable directly connected to one of these devices or directly to a primary or secondary TV, please let the FCC know. If they go through with it, I'll drop Comcast so fast it will make their head spin, so again, how is it helping their bottom line?

A lot of librarians were sympathetic to Oatmeal's critique (if not his solution) because publishers and movie studios are trying to screw us out of our legal first sale rights or at least make library borrowing less appealing, by delaying sales of DVDs to us and only selling us extras-free rental versions, by not selling us ebooks or making them very expensive for us, and when they do sell them they are hard to download. Because their business plan is to get everyone to pay full price for each piece of entertainment they want (and cable channels they don't want) when the public didn't do that before, and in a weak economy too. Bravo, Big Media, Bravo!




funny gifs  


Confidential to Salman Rushdie: I'll be more sympathetic to your plea not to cut ebook prices when you tell your publisher Random House not to raise ebook prices for libraries 300%.





Kthxbye, 




         Badass Jfro



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THINGS I PAY FOR ONLINE

This I ripped off from library guru Walt Crawford , who got it from SF author and uber-blogger John Scalzi . From whom I learned that AOL still exists and that there is a paid version of LiveJournal. Who knew? And why Rhapsody? Who are these people who are willing to pay every month to rent music that could be taken away from them at any time? Those who don't want the option of making a mix CD or tape do not love music in any way I can understand. I was glad that some of Scalzi's commentors mentioned library subscriptions. Don't pay for any online encyclopedias or magazine articles if you can get them free with your library card, people! The f ree Encyclopedia Britannica subscription for bloggers is also awesome. 1. IpHouse for Internet with Qwest DSL. I could save by bundling with Qwest and get msn.com email (ugh!), but IpHouse has given me such great support over the years and I can always get someone on the phone right away. 2. Netflix (4 movies-at-a-time grandfat
I, FOR ONE, WELCOME OUR NEW PORCINE OVERLORDS . . . I read an article in the New Yorker (1) last year about the growing threat of feral hogs. Apparently they have become a major nuisance in most of the US, destroying native habitat and species, even uprooting irrigation pipes. Plus, they are so wily and tough that only an expert hunter with at least 4 dogs can defeat one. Now, I learn that wild hogs may have caused the most recent outbreak of e. coli . It's clear what's going on -- the pigs are trying to kill us! Trichinosis just wasn't doing the job. With all the bacon I've eaten, I'll be the first up against the wall after the piggy revolution (here is where my sweetie Dr. Somneblex thoughtfully points out that he's given up pork). Coincidentally, I was just reading Oryx and Crake , which features the protagonist being attacked by genetically-altered super-pigs. Clearly, a pig-related horror movie is going to go into production any minute now. A good ti

STILL HATING ON MONTHLY SUBSCRIPTIONS

Jason had an insightful post on newspapers in the Internet Age on his blog wherein he suggested we donate to keep the watchdogs of the press going. In an aside, he mentioned subscriptions for music: To be honest, it's the same thing with music downloads. I've been screaming for monthly subscriptions for years now, and they're still not here. (At least not on the scale of an iTunes or Amazon.) Of course, I had to respond. Jason: I'm sorry to hear you've been screaming for years--you must be very hoarse. I believe the service you're looking for is called Rhapsody . I don't know what counts as "the same scale", but they have ads on TV. I don't know why anyone would pay $12.99/month to rent music, though. I want to own my music, I don't want some company to be able to take my access away or jack up the price at a whim. Rhapsody's main market must be people who don't own much music, have a lot of electronic devices but no interest